Rental listings that do not look like rental listings.
A rental competes for attention on the same portal, in the same feed, against listings that had a photographer. The difference is usually that nobody budgeted one. The same tools work on a rental, at the same price.
The same per listing pricing, no subscription
What makes this hard.
Worth naming plainly, because the answer is only interesting if the problem is real.
- 01
Rental marketing gets the smallest budget and the same feed
A buyer and a renter scroll the same portal in the same way. Photos taken quickly between tenancies are competing against campaigns that had a full shoot behind them.
- 02
The property is usually empty when you photograph it
Vacant rooms read smaller and colder than they are, and a renter has to imagine their own furniture in them. That is a solvable problem and it does not need hire furniture.
- 03
Vacancy costs more than the marketing
Every extra week on market is a week of rent you do not collect. Against that, the marketing spend is rarely the expensive part of the decision.
What matters most here
Every capability runs against any listing. These are the ones that carry the most weight in this situation.
Frequently asked questions.
Is there a rental specific version of DomeAgent?
+−
No. There is one product, and a rental is a listing like any other. Nothing is tailored specifically to leasing, which also means nothing about it is priced differently.
Can I use it for multiple properties?
+−
Yes. Each property is its own listing and is paid for separately, so a portfolio costs the same per property as a single one.
Do I need a property manager or agency account?
+−
No. A solo account is free to hold and is the right fit for managing your own properties.